Hi, Tony.
I have a copy of your 70-562 Self Pace Training Kit book.
What are the differences between 70-515 and 70-562 Self Pace Training kits books?

Heya, Russell.

The 70-515 Training Kit was based on the 70-562 manuscript, so you’ll recognize quite a bit of it. If you’ve already worked through the 70-562 TK, I’d tell you to skip 70-515 and spend a week working with jQuery, LINQ to Entities, Dynamic Data Projects, and every aspect of MVC.

If you haven’t yet read through 70-562, scrap it and use the 70-515 book instead. In addition to adding the topics I just mentioned, Mike and I added quite a bit of content to the previous topics and fixed lots of little nit-picky mistakes that always work themselves into a big complex book like this. Not that there were big problems with the 70-562 Training Kit; it got good reviews. We found minor errors like C# classes with the wrong capitalization, etc–stuff that managed to slip past our reviewers.

Let me know if you have any other questions.

Tony

These tutorials cover .NET Framework fundamentals such as creating classes, using types and events, regular expressions, reading and writing files, and using collections. I designed these tutorials to give people the prerequisites they need to take the 70-515 and 70-511 Microsoft Certification exams. Everything is available in both C# and Visual Basic.NET.

If you find them useful and you want more, drop me a note. I’m happy to create more content if people like it.

I am studying for exam 70-515 using your excellent book and training kit. I just found what appears to be an error or maybe I didnt understand the wording used at page 87 where it says:
“ASP.NET calls the method you specify when it determines whether to use the cached version of the page. Depending on how you set the HttpValidationStatus in your handler, ASP.NET will use a cached page or a new, dynamically generated version.”
My question is, if asp.net already determined whether to use the cached  version of the page or not then what good is to set the HttpValidationStatus in your handler?

My response (after the jump):

First, the Visual Basic .NET version:

Now, the C# version:

First, the Visual Basic version:

Next, the C# version:

Next, the C# Version:

The video above and the article below compare two free virtual machine applications designed for home users: Microsoft Virtual PC and Sun VirtualBox.

What is a Virtual Machine (VM)?

A virtual machine (VM) is a computer that runs inside a window on your host computer. VMs are also great for testing–you can test different operating systems, applications, and configurations without messing up your computer. For example, you could run Windows in a VM on a Linux or Macintosh computer, allowing you to run Windows-only applications. Or, you could test out Linux in a VM on your Windows box without committing to it.

In fact, even if you install spyware, adware, or rootkits in a VM, they won’t infect your host computer. Just shut down the VM, and your computer is as clean as ever. VMs are also a great tool for learning networking, allowing you to connect several different computers when you only have one computer available.

After the jump, my recommendations for home users who want to use VMs:

Microsoft Virtual PC

Virtual PC is the right choice for people who just need to test downloads or browse the Web with total privacy. It’s free with Windows 7–in fact, Microsoft even includes a license for Windows XP to allow you to run any old applications that aren’t compatible with Windows 7. It’s polished, fast, reliable, and (like VirtualBox) it can share USB devices and network connections.

It also has a couple of unique features: It can log you on automatically to a Windows VM, it’s integrated into the Windows 7 Explorer interface, and it supports the AERO interface in Windows 7. It’s biggest downfall? It can’t run Windows Server 2008 R2, because it doesn’t support 64-bit VMs. Your host computer can run 64-bit versions of Windows, however.

Sun VirtualBox

This is my favorite free virtualization software because it does several things Microsoft Virtual PC can’t do. First, it can run 64-bit VMs. That’s important, because Windows Server 2008 R2 is only available in 64-bit. Second, it supports multiple processors on the VM, which can improve performance.

Third, and most importantly, VirtualBox supports snapshots. With a snapshot, you capture the state of a VM. Later, if you mess up the VM, you can return it to the snapshot state–like instantly restoring a computer from a backup. With a snapshot, you never have to worry about messing up a VM. Snapshots are great when you need to test something repeatedly and you want the computer to be in a “clean” state when you do it.

Feature Comparison

Both apps support the following features:

• Run on 32-bit or 64-bit hosts.
• Install integration software on the VM so that you can move your mouse in and out of the window–though this must be done after the operating system is installed.
• Supports a variety of different operating systems on the VM, including different versions of Windows and Linux.
• Connect USB devices to the VM–though this isn’t working in VirtualBox on a Windows 7 host for me–I get an error when it attempts to install the driver.
• Automatically change the VM by resizing the VM window (this requires you to press a key in VirtualBox, but not in Virtual PC).

Microsoft Virtual PC has these unique features:

• Supports Aero in Windows 7. This is the pretty, glass-like user interface, along with Aero-features like 3D-flip. To get Aero in VirtualBox, you need to connect to the VM using Remote Desktop.
• Automatic login for Windows VMs. This saves you having to type Ctrl+Alt+Del and your password.
• USB device sharing works properly with Windows 7. VirtualBox offers this feature, but it’s not working for all USB devices–for me, at least.
• Integrated into Windows Explorer. VMs appear as files in a folder. Actually, I hate this feature–I’d prefer starting VMs from within an application.

Sun VirtualBox has these unique feature:

• Runs on Windows, Linux, and Mac hosts. I’m a Windows guy myself, but I suppose if you’re using Linux or Mac, you’ll need this so you can run all those Windows apps in a VM. Ouch! No hatin’!
• Run 64-bit VMs. This allows you to run Windows Server 2008 R2, which isn’t available as 32-bit.
• Seamless mode. Applications in the VM act as standard Windows on your desktop. In other words, you can start an application in the VM, and move it anywhere on your desktop, even outside of the VM window. In the figure below, notice that I’m running Internet Explorer in Windows 7 on the lower window, and Internet Explorer in Windows XP on the upper window.

• Remote display. You can use Remote Desktop (or any RDP client) to connect to a VirtualBox VM, even if the VM’s operating system doesn’t support it or the OS hasn’t yet been installed.
• 3D and 2D video acceleration. This might allow you to do some 3D work, though performance still won’t be great on games.
• Multiple processors. VirtualBox supports up to 8 CPUs in your VM–as long as your host has that many.

The Winner

VirtualBox is the clear winner–though I still need to use Virtual PC for those times when I need to share a USB device with a VM. I’ll also use Virtual PC for those times when I need the Aero user interface but Remote Desktop won’t do the trick.

Other Free Virtualization Software

I should also mention two other free virtualization products, even though they’re intended for businesses:

• VMWare Server. It’s free, and it works, but it’s a pain to setup and run compared to VirtualBox or Virtual PC. What you really want for home environments is the far more useful VMWare Workstation–but you have to buy that at $189.
• Microsoft Hyper-V.  It’s also free, but it’s intended for IT, so you’re going to have to read the instructions to use it. I say BOO to reading! Also, you can’t run it as an application on your existing computer.

Windows XP, Windows Server 2003, and especially Windows Vista have greatly improved scripting. Now, you can do almost anything from the command-line or a script. Windows PowerShell takes those capabilities to the next level. If you’re in IT, I highly recommend reading up on it–you’ll save yourself time in the long run. If you have development or scripting experience, it’ll be that much easier to learn. If you don’t, it’s still very much worth your time.

Download the 32-bit version here, and the 64-bit version here. Also, check out the Windows PowerShell blog.

Tony,

I know you likely get a lot of email, however I just have a quick question.  In one of your pages you mention X-10 sending email in case basement floods.  Do you know where I can obtain an X-10 moisture sensor?  I think I can code everything else to send the text message to my cell.  Great job on your videos.  I’m a fan!

TIA!

Answer:

Yep, check out this water sensor. You’ll also need an X10 PowerFlash module to connect it to. The water sensor just throws a relay, the PowerFlash module does the work of sending the X10 signal.

If you like those sidebar gadgets and you have any interest in development, check out OdeToCode’s article on developing gadgets for Windows Sidebar. Scott gives you an overview of the gadget platform and gets you started down the path of making your own gadget. I haven’t gotten around to making my own yet, but I’m very interested in it–looks like a fun way to develop. Let me know if you do something interesting with it.

It would be reasonable to assume that .NET 3.0 provides a similar upgrade that .NET 1.0 to .NET 2.0 did. It’s not, though. Whereas .NET 2.0 changed a lot of existing aspects of .NET 1.0, .NET 3.0 mostly adds classes. Plus, they’re mostly presentation and gaming classes, so Web and business developers probably won’t be that interested. Hopefully, since it’s built into Vista, we’ll see more and more audio, video, and gaming apps built using the .NET Framework.
While reading Marc’s blog I found a link to Rob Eisenberg’s site, where he provides a very useful multi-part crash course for .NET 3.0. Looks like a great place to start. Also check out the video over at ContentPresenter.com (you’ll have to jump through some hoops–it’s a zipped download that requires a special codec).

Hi Tony,

I have been reading you vista clues and I appreciate the help.

Is there a way to run a batch file on vista to set the “Run as administrator” on an exe.

We have a exe that is delivered to our customers monthly. The exe writes files and expects them to be were we installed the product. Of course, with vista this is not true. I can fix this problem but setting the Run as administrator.

The applications are built under XP so I can not set this property before I packages, so what I was thinking was as part of my install/update

Install the exe on vista and then run a batch program to set it as run as administrator. I can not have the customer do this manually.

Do you think this will work? Do you know how to do this?

Any help would be appreciated.

Thank you

Answer:

Your best bet is probably to add a manifest to your application, and release it as an update (a batch file could just replace the .exe, if you’re determined to go that route). To add a manifest to existing applications, use the Application Compatibility Toolkit (ACT). You might be able to figure out a way to script the ACT, but then again, it might not be worth the effort.

That’s still not a great answer, because it requires your users to have administrative credentials (which they won’t in many organizations). For the best answer, use the Standard User Analyzer tool, to diagnose issues that would prevent a program from running properly as a standard user. Then, fix your app to work as a standard user. Your customers will appreciate it.

Good luck.

Tony